Br-20-6096 & 6097, has actually testified in Court. The Order dated September 24, 2007, showed that private complainant-victim, AAA, in the abovequoted cases, Crim. 20-4979 involving the same accused but different private complainant-victim, XXX, which if considered will result in a different verdict.
Upon manifestation of Assistant Provincial Prosecutor Roderick Cruz that there were Orders that were inadvertently placed in the record of Criminal Case No. On the same day, however, the RTC recalled the said decision and issued an Order, stating: On July 26, 2011, the RTC promulgated a Decision acquitting the accused-appellant. Īccused-appellant, through his counsel, manifested in open court that he would no longer present any evidence for the defense and submitted the case for decision. CCC testified that she found, among others, deep, healed, old and superficial lacerations in the hymen of AAA and concluded that these indicated positive sexual intercourse. BBB brought her to the Municipal Health Office where she was examined by Dr. ĪAA eventually told her mother, BBB, about the incident. On both occasions, accused-appellant threatened to kill AAA if she told anybody what had happened. Two months later, accused-appellant went inside AAA's house through a window one night, undressed himself and AAA, and inserted his penis inside her vagina. There, accused-appellant removed AAA's shorts and t-shirt, laid on top of her, and inserted his penis into her vagina. Upon arraignment, accused-appellant entered a plea of not guilty and trial ensued.ĭuring trial, AAA testified that accused-appellant followed her, grabbed her, and brought her to the back of a school. 20-6096 & 20-6097, finding accused-appellant Lino Alejandro y Pimentel guilty beyond reasonable doubt of two counts of rape.Īccused-appellant was charged with two counts of rape, defined and penalized under Article 266-A, paragraph 1(a) of the Revised Penal Code, in relation to Republic Act No. 05256, which affirmed the JJoint Decision rendered by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Cauayan City, Isabela, Branch 20 in Criminal Case Nos. You can do so by calling Chambers Law Firm at 71 for a free legal consultation.This is an appeal from the Decision dated Februof the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. If you have been charged with a crime, you should contact an attorney as soon as possible. When you have the right criminal defense attorney, they can aggressively negotiate to get you the best deal on the table. In fact, finding the best possible plea deal is often the best option. They can also have their charges reduced. When a person is charged with a serious felony, being acquitted or having their case dismissed are not the only two ways they can avoid prison. Prosecutors must prove that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, while a personal injury attorney must only prove that the defendant is more likely to have committed the act than not committed the act. This is because the standard of proof for a civil case is less than it is in a criminal case. It is Possible to Be Acquitted and Still Face Civil LiabilitiesĪ person can be acquitted of a crime but then held civically liable for the same offense. However, if the person is acquitted, then double jeopardy has attached and the defendant cannot be prosecuted for the same crime. If charges are dismissed, jeopardy has not been attached and the accused can be charged again with the same crime (under certain specifications).
Dismissals generally occur because the judge does not feel that the case has credibility or the prosecutor does not have the evidence to support their case. This is also different from a dismissal in that a dismissal comes before the case goes to trial. It only means that the prosecutor was not able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person committed the crime. What an Acquittal Means – and What it Does Not MeanĪn acquittal does not mean that a person is innocent. An acquittal means that a judge or jury found that a person was not guilty of the crime they were charged with. Generally, this means that the prosecution did not meet their burden of proof. If a person is found not guilty from a crime, it means that they are not legally answerable for the crime they were charged for. If you are facing criminal charges, contact a criminal defense attorney who can help you: Chambers Law Firm at 71. If you are curious about the difference, keep reading. However, there is a difference between the two. It is true that acquittal is a general term that means not guilty.
0 kommentar(er)
